翻訳と辞書 Words near each other ・ Central Gloucester Historic District ・ Central Gonja District ・ Central Goods railway station ・ Central government ・ Central Government Complex ・ Central Government Health Scheme ・ Central Government War Headquarters ・ Central governor ・ Central Governorate, Bahrain ・ Central Graded School ・ Central Great Plains (ecoregion) ・ Central Great Southern Football League ・ Central Greece ・ Central Greece (region) ・ Central Greece Motorway ・ Central Green Co. v. United States ・ Central Greene School District ・ Central Greyhound Lines ・ Central Grocers Cooperative ・ Central Grocery ・ Central Ground ・ Central Group ・ Central Group of Forces ・ Central Grove ・ Central Grove, Mississippi ・ Central Grove, Nova Scotia ・ Central Guidance Commission on Building Spiritual Civilization ・ Central Gujarat ・ Central Guoshu Institute ・ Central Guánica Dictionary Lists mini英和辞書 mini和英辞書 Webster 1913 Latin-English FOLDOC Wikipedia English ウィキペディア

翻訳と辞書　辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ] スポンサード リンク Central Green Co. v. United States ： ウィキペディア英語版 Central Green Co. v. United States ''Central Green Co. v. United States'', (531 U.S. 425 ) (2001), was a United States Supreme Court case decided in 2001. The case concerned the meaning of the words "flood or flood waters" within the Flood Control Act of 1928. The Court concluded that the law did not always apply to federal flood control facilities. ==Background== Central Green Co. owned 1,000 acres of pistachio orchards in California's San Joaquin Valley. The Madera Canal flowed through their property. In 1996, they brought a suit against the United States alleging negligence in the operation and design of the canal. They alleged that it causes subsurface flooding which destroyed some of their crop.〔(531 U.S. 425 ) at 428.〕 In court, the United States argued that the Flood Control Act of 1928 grants them immunity, as it states "()o liability of any kind shall attach to or rest upon the United States for any damage from or by floods or flood waters at any place".〔(531 U.S. 425 ) at 426.〕 The District Court dismissed the complaint, agreeing with the United States that this incident would fall in the confines of "flood or flood waters". Central Green Co. appealed and the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed. It agreed with Central Green that the Madera Canal "serves no flood control purpose", but nevertheless held that immunity attached "solely because it is a branch of the Central Valley Project".〔(531 U.S. 425 ) at 429.〕 Central Green appealed again, this time to the United States Supreme Court, which granted review. 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「Central Green Co. v. United States」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.